DOE: Pause on US LNG export permits remains despite New Fortress authorization

**Developments in US LNG Export Permits: Despite New Authorizations, Pause Remains**

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has recently authorized a significant new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export project by New Fortress Energy, known as the Fast LNG 1 project, marking the first such authorization since the DOE paused all pending applications for LNG exports in January 2024. However, this development does not signify an end to the pause on future authorizations.

**Background on the Pause**

In January 2024, the Biden administration initiated a temporary “pause” on pending decisions regarding the export of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to non-free trade agreement (FTA) countries. This decision was made to allow the DOE to update its economic and environmental analyses to better account for current and future considerations, such as potential increases in energy costs for American consumers and manufacturers, and a more comprehensive assessment of the impact of greenhouse gas emissions. The agency also acknowledged the evolving understanding of the economic and environmental impacts associated with LNG exports and the need to protect frontline communities adjacent to export terminals.

**New Fortress Energy’s Authorization**

On September 3, 2024, the DOE approved a five-year term for New Fortress Energy’s Fast LNG 1 project to export gas produced in the US to non-FTA countries. Despite this authorization, a DOE spokesperson clarified that this action does not mean the pause on US LNG export permits is over. The decision specifically authorizes the already constructed and operational Altamira floating LNG export platform, located off the coast of Mexico in the Gulf of Mexico, to re-export up to 0.4 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd) of US-sourced natural gas as LNG to non-FTA countries for a five-year export term.

**Impact and Criticism**

The authorization has faced criticism from environmental groups. Food & Water Watch, for instance, labeled the decision as “ridiculous”

Để lại một bình luận

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *